Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron A1150

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Opteron A1150

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Opteron A1150 with 8 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 28nm)
Opteron A1150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Seattle
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP1
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron(Seattle)

Package

Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
32 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
80°C
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
mm²
Die Size
182 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
144
Total Core Count
8
288
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
17.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB shared
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3, DDR4-1866
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
8

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy