Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon Platinum 8260

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon Platinum 8260

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Xeon Platinum 8260 with 24 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Xeon Platinum 8260 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (165W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)

Package

Transistor Count
8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
165 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
144
Total Core Count
24
288
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
35.75 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy