Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon X5365

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon X5365

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 65nm)
Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)

Package

Transistor Count
0.582 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
144
Total Core Count
4
288
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
9.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
0
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy