Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 with 12 cores 1.9GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 's Advantages
Released 117 years and 1 months late
Higher base frequency (1.9GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 16MB)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2666)
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 +26%
643
Centaur CHA
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
2205
Centaur CHA +53%
3379
VS

General Parameters

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
80 W
Power Consumption
70 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
2x213 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
SP4
Package
FC-LGA2084

CPU Performance

1.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
12
Total Core Count
8
24
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
19.0
Multiplier
12.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
32 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy