Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Xeon 6756E

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Xeon 6756E

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon 6756E with 128 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 96MB)
Xeon 6756E 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Lower TDP (225W vs 360W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Sierra Forest
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4710
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon 6(Sierra Forest-SP)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
225 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
96°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
10 nm
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
96
Total Core Count
128
192
Total Thread Count
128
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
18.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per module
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
96 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
-
Max Memory Size
1 TB
12
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
5
128
PCIe Lanes
88

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy