Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Celeron 4205U

VS

Apple M2 Ultra

Intel Celeron 4205U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Apple M2 Ultra with 24 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Celeron 4205U with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Apple M2 Ultra 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 4 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2133)

Larger memory bandwidth (800GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.8GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron 4205U 's Advantages

Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Apple M2 Ultra +681%

2790

Intel Celeron 4205U

357

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Apple M2 Ultra +4068%

21217

Intel Celeron 4205U

509

Blender

Apple M2 Ultra +8316%

505

Intel Celeron 4205U

6

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Apple M2 Ultra +340%

1956

Intel Celeron 4205U

444

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Apple M2 Ultra +3179%

27945

Intel Celeron 4205U

852

Passmark CPU Single Core

Apple M2 Ultra +300%

4137

Intel Celeron 4205U

1033

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Apple M2 Ultra +3553%

48776

Intel Celeron 4205U

1335

Apple M2 Ultra

VS

Intel Celeron 4205U

General Parameters

May 2023

Release Date

Jan 2019

Apple

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

ARMv8

Instruction Set

x86-64

Apple M2

Core Architecture

Whiskey Lake

-

Processor Number

4205U

Apple M-Socket

Socket

BGA-1528

Apple M2 Max GPU (76-core)

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 610

Package

134 billions

Transistor Count

-

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

60 W

Power Consumption

15 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

16

Performance Cores

2

16

Performance Core Threads

2

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.8 GHz

8

Efficiency Cores

-

8

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2.4 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

2

24

Total Thread Count

2

35x

Multiplier

-

192 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

64 MB shared

L2 Cache

256 K per core

-

L3 Cache

2 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866

192 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

16

Max Memory Channels

2

800 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

900 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.06 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

Intel Celeron 4205U

4.0

PCIe Version

2.0

-

PCIe Lanes

12

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 5 7540U

2

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i5 11300H

3

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i5 1030G7

4

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i7 1160G7

5

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Celeron N5100

6

Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

7

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i7 14650HX

8

Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

9

Apple M2 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

10

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster