Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 7900M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 180W)
Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2090MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
3174
Radeon RX 7900M
+1113%
38520
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
3440
Radeon RX 7900M
+429%
18218
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
1599
Radeon RX 7900M
+427%
8440
3DMark Speed Way
Arc A370M
170
Radeon RX 7900M
+2219%
3943
Blender
Arc A370M
251
Radeon RX 7900M
+929%
2583
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
72
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
192
8
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
180W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Navi 31
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
