Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 9174F

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 9174F

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC 9174F with 16 cores 4.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9174F 's Advantages
Released 121 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
AMD EPYC 9174F +194%
2311
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
AMD EPYC 9174F +233%
13296
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Nov 2022
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Genoa
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
320 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
195 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
41.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
44
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy