Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon W 3335

Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon W 3335

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Released 120 years and 6 months late
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
Intel Xeon W 3335 +71%
1351
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
Intel Xeon W 3335 +165%
10557
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Jul 2021
VIA
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-W
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)

Package

16 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
250 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
78 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
195 mm²
Die Size
-

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
34.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
44
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy