Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs RTX A2000 Embedded

Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2050MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +103%
16790
RTX A2000 Embedded
8253

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
32
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA107S
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net