Home Comparison FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000 +243%
2432
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net