FirePro S7000 vs TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
TITAN X Pascal
+351%
10970
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP102
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
