FireStream 9250 vs CMP 90HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 90HX
+2089%
21890
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
50
800
Shading Units
6400
40
TMUs
200
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
200
-
RT Cores
50
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.89 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.89 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
320W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA102-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
