Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs FirePro S7150

FireStream 9250 vs FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
FirePro S7150 +276%
3768

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2016
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Tonga
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net