FireStream 9250 vs FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+61%
1000
FirePro V4800
620
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
5
800
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Redwood
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
