FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 1050
+86%
1862
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4