FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+434%
5345
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK180
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
