Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 970

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 970

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 970 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 970 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (148W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 970 +292%
3920

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2014
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
1664
40
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.97 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.5 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.920 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
122.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
148W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GM204
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GM204-200-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net