FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX TITAN
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX TITAN 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX TITAN
+370%
4709
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
836 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2688
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.06 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
196.2 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.709 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.570 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK110
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK110-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1