FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro V520
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro V520
+637%
7373
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
36
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 12
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 12
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
