FireStream 9250 vs RTX A5000 8Q
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM RTX A5000 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
RTX A5000 8Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX A5000 8Q
+2677%
27770
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
64
800
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7