FireStream 9250 vs Radeon X800 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Radeon X800 GTO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
49W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
R423
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
-
