FireStream 9250 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2573%
26730
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
800
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
