GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 285
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 190W)
Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+34%
4416
Radeon R9 285
3290
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Tonga
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO
(215-0851128)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5