GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1335MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+132%
4101
Arc A350M
1766
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+80%
4973
Arc A350M
2749
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+72%
2304
Arc A350M
1336
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+121%
870
Arc A350M
392
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
