GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+698%
2458
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
112
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU117
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
