GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
+2062%
6659
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
34
112
Shading Units
2176
56
TMUs
136
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
272
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.92 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.32 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.659 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
208.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
175W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU106
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
TU106-410-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
