Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs B200 SXM 192 GB

GeForce GTX 780 vs B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1837MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780
4156
B200 SXM 192 GB +1393%
62080
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
2304
Shading Units
16896
192
TMUs
528
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GB100
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
208 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy