Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1500MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780
4156
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +158%
10750
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
2304
Shading Units
3584
192
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Vega 10
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy