Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon R9 290

GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780
4156
Radeon R9 290 +16%
4849
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 780
2795
Radeon R9 290 +31%
3684
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy