GeForce MX250 vs RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 115W)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1695MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1859%
15620
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+725%
8910
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1512%
3580
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3738%
2764
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
36
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
115W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
AD106
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
