Home Comparison Intel Celeron 6305 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

Intel Celeron 6305 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with 16 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Lower TDP (15W vs 55W)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 3733)
Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 51.2GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron 6305
640
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +320%
2688
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron 6305
1089
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +1337%
15655
VS

General Parameters

Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Tiger Lake
Core Architecture
Zen 4 (Dragon Range)
6305
Processor Number
-
BGA-1449
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M

Package

-
Transistor Count
13.14 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
55 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
16
2
Performance Core Threads
32
1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
2
Total Core Count
16
2
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18x
Multiplier
24
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Memory Types
DDR5-5200
64 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
-

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
400 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
2200 MHz
384
Shader Units
128
24
Texture Units
8
12
Raster Operation Units
4
48
Execution Units
2
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
0.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.563 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
3.0
PCIe Version
5.0
-
PCIe Lanes
28

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy