Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 12900KS

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 12900KS

Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core i9 12900KS
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core i9 12900KS
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i9 12900KS with 16 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
Intel Core i9 12900KS 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
395
Intel Core i9 12900KS +547%
2559
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
675
Intel Core i9 12900KS +2203%
15546
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
476
Intel Core i9 12900KS +328%
2041
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
888
Intel Core i9 12900KS +1891%
17685
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
1224
Intel Core i9 12900KS +255%
4357
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
1704
Intel Core i9 12900KS +2509%
44470
Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core i9 12900KS

General Parameters

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Alder Lake-S
J4025
Processor Number
i9-12900KS
BGA-1090
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
150 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
-
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
2
Total Core Count
16
2
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
34x
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB shared
L2 Cache
14 MB shared
-
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
8 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1550 MHz
96
Shader Units
256
12
Texture Units
16
2
Raster Operation Units
8
12
Execution Units
32
5 W
Power Consumption
15 W
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025
Official Website
Intel Core i9 12900KS
2.0
PCIe Version
5.0
6
PCIe Lanes
20
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 8400T
2
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 13700T
3
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 13900KF
4
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
5
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 7600
6
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240
7
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 10600KF
9
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Pentium Gold G7400
10
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy