Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

VS

Intel Core 7 240H

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 7 240H with 10 cores 2.5GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core 7 240H 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 2 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core 7 240H +128%

2341

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

1025

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core 7 240H +357%

12108

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

2649

Intel Core 7 240H

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Oct 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Raptor Lake-H

Core Architecture

Raven Ridge

Intel BGA 1744

Socket

FP5

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 8

Core 7(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.9 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

45 W

Power Consumption

15 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

4

12

Performance Core Threads

8

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

5.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.6 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

10

Total Core Count

4

16

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

20x

80 KB per core

L1 Cache

128 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

-

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

35.76 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1100 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

8

-

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

1.13 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core 7 240H

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

5

PCIe Version

3.0

8

PCIe Lanes

12

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Pentium N4200

2

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i7 11370H

3

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Celeron 4205U

4

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U

5

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

6

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

7

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 3 5400U

8

Intel Core 7 240H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

9

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i5 10400H

10

Intel Core 7 240H vs Apple M1 Max

Related News

1

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

2

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

3

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

4

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

5

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

6

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

7

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

8

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

9

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

10

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim