Intel Core i5 13400T vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

VS

Intel Core i5 13400T

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 13400T with 10 cores 1.3GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 13400T 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 3 months late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 47.68GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)

Lower TDP (35W vs 105W)

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 1.3GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 20MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 13400T

2202

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X +1%

2235

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 13400T

8904

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X +41%

12589

Intel Core i5 13400T

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Oct 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Raptor Lake

Core Architecture

Zen 3 (Vermeer)

i5-13400

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

AM4

UHD Graphics 730

Integrated Graphics

No

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.15 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

35 W

Power Consumption

105 W

82 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

90°C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

12

Performance Core Threads

24

1.3 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.7 GHz

4.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.8 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.0 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.0 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

10

Total Core Count

12

16

Total Thread Count

24

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

13

Multiplier

37x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

9.5 MB

L2 Cache

512 K per core

20 MB

L3 Cache

64 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

192 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

47.68 GB/s

-

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1550 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

48

Texture Units

-

24

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 13400T

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

5.0

PCIe Version

4.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

2

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i5 8500

3

Intel Core i5 13400T vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

4

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i5 11500

5

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i9 7960X

6

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i3 10100

7

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i3 9300

8

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Pentium Gold G5420

9

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i9 7900X

10

Intel Core i5 13400T vs Intel Core i9 10980XE

Related News

1

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

2

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

3

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

4

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

5

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

6

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

7

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

8

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

9

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

10

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim