Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i9 14900KS

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

Intel Core i9 14900KS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i9 14900KS with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T 's Advantages

Released 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Intel Core i9 14900KS 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)

Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

VS

Intel Core i9 14900KS

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Mar 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

i9-14900KS

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1700

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 770

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

35 W

Power Consumption

150 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

253 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

8

Performance Core Threads

16

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.2 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

6.2 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

16

12

Efficiency Core Threads

16

1.8 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2.4 GHz

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

20

Total Core Count

24

20

Total Thread Count

32

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24

Multiplier

32x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

36 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200

256 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1650 MHz

-

Shader Units

256

-

Texture Units

16

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

32

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Graphics Performance

0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i9 14900KS

5

PCIe Version

5.0

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i7 7740X

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i5 14490F

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Celeron J4005

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Pentium G4560

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i7 13700KF

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i3 10100

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core i9 9900KF

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Related News

1

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

2

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

3

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

4

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

5

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

6

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

7

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

8

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

9

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

10

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim