Home Comparison Intel Xeon E3 1280 vs AMD EPYC 9825

Intel Xeon E3 1280 vs AMD EPYC 9825

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E3 1280 with 4 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E3 1280 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 1155
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E3 (Sandy Bridge)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))

Package

1.16 billions
Transistor Count
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
390 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
216 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
144
-
Performance Core Threads
288
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
144
8
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
2
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy