Home Comparison Intel Xeon Gold 5320H vs AMD EPYC 9275F

Intel Xeon Gold 5320H vs AMD EPYC 9275F

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Gold 5320H with 20 cores 2.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9275F with 24 cores 4.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Gold 5320H 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9275F 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 2667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 27.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cooper Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Gold (Cooper Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
66.52 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
150 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
24
-
Performance Core Threads
48
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
40
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
41.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
27.5 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
4
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2667
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
6
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
48
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy