Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 4464P

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 4464P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 4464P with 12 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 4464P 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Raphael
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Raphael))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
13.14 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
105 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
61 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
2x71 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
122 mm²

CPU Performance

1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
57
Total Core Count
12
228
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
37.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-5200
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
28

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy