Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC 4364P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC 4364P with 8 cores 4.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 4364P 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (105W vs 245W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2024
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Raphael
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
6.57 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
105 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
61 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
71 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
122 mm²
CPU Performance
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
60
Total Core Count
8
240
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
45.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-5200
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
28
