Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC 9684X
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC 9684X with 96 cores 2.55GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 5120D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 400W)
AMD EPYC 9684X 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2023
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
135.24 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
400 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
60
Total Core Count
96
240
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
25.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
1152 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
