Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC 8224PN

Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC 8224PN

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC 8224PN with 24 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 8224PN 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (120W vs 245W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Sep 2023
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Siena
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
120 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
60
Total Core Count
24
240
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
20.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy