Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC 7642

Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC 7642

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250 with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC 7642 with 48 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Phi 7250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 225W)
AMD EPYC 7642 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
162
AMD EPYC 7642 +635%
1191
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
2414
AMD EPYC 7642 +370%
11362
VS

General Parameters

Jun 2016
Release Date
Aug 2019
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Rome
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
3.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
215 W
Power Consumption
225 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
74 mm²

CPU Performance

1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
68
Total Core Count
48
272
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
24.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy