Home Comparison Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q with 38 cores 2.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (57MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 270W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q +52%
1335
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
874
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q +733%
42239
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
5069
VS

General Parameters

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum (Ice Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
55 W
85 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
38
Total Core Count
8
76
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
25.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
57 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
8
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy