Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (2350MHz vs 1150MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Arc 140T Mobile
+553%
4813
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
320
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
