Home Comparison Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce MX250

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1650MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +217%
2534
GeForce MX250
797

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Unknown
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GP108B
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net