Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1650MHz vs 1177MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+137%
6026
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GA107
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
