Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
RTX A1000 Embedded
+420%
6664
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
32
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
60W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA107S
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
