Home Comparison Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 4386 with 8 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 4386 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Opteron 4386
430
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +361%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Opteron 4386
1860
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +972%
19940
VS

General Parameters

Dec 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Seoul
Core Architecture
Genoa
AMD Socket C32
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Seoul)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

1.2 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
360 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
315 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.5
Multiplier
24.0
384 K
L1 Cache
64 K per core
8 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy