Home Comparison Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro P5200 Max Q +30796%
8033

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net